(Question mark by Marco Bellucci) |
Who
regulates the internet? From the resources that I found, it says that the
TCP/IP protocol on which all Internet protocols are based is not patented and
can be implemented by anyone. It can also continue to operate without any one
central system in charge .The short answer is no one regulates the internet.
Personally,
there are pro and con about whether the Internet should be censored. From my
point of view, the pro is it is too easy for children to access pornographic
material. Since there are so many adult sites are readily accessible to
children. A child could innocently click on it. The con is parents should know
what they need to do, to prevent their children can access that kind of site
(porno). There’s lots of software to block offensive sites, so parents can
install the software. Internet censorship already exists, just Google
"internet filter" and look at the variety of private software which
do this for you without government
intervention.There’s lots of software to block offensive sites, so
parents can install the software,just google it.
Another
reasons is, about First
Amendment right to free speech (as it should fall under the freedom of the
press and freedom of speech). Freedom of expression is one of the fundamental
human rights ensured us by the Constitution (Perlembagaan). Anyone should be
allowed to post whatever they want (self control), as part of their rights for
freedom of speech and freedom of the press but we can stop the communication of
material which it is illegal to possess.
In Prince
Harry naked pictures case, the tabloid newspaper has chosen to publish the nude
pictures because the issue has become one of "The freedom of the Press". The Sun has become the first British
newspaper to publish images of a naked Prince Harry at a Las Vegas party.
“For us
this is the part of the freedom of the press. The picture can be seen by the
hundreds millions of people around the world on the internet” – The Sun Boss
(Long version)
In conclusion,
there are pro and con about whether the Internet should be censored just like what I
said . Then, we just have to control ourselves to not post or make communication
of material which it is illegal to possess.
Created by Nurain bt Md Ariff (1112701449)
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI think there should be censorship on the internet. The parents will feel less burden and not worrying at all about their children accessing the internet. Oh! Not all parents(including my parents) know much on how to prevent their children from accessing any offensive websites and some of them have no time to install software that are able to block any offensive web sites as they are always busy with works.
ReplyDeletePros are the positive things and cons are the negative things, correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to me you mixed up those words..
ReplyDeleteBut back to topic, i agree with the rules you have brought up about. Of course this goes back to ACT114A, in which the rules are made to give other parties an excuse to bring down hateful content.